Improve AI systems with real-world experts

We connect doctors, lawyers, regulatory specialists, and local experts to evaluate, correct, and improve AI systems before failures become expensive in production.

Who we work with

Doctors, lawyers, regulatory specialists, and local experts.

What they do

Review production tasks, identify failures, and create high-signal data.

Why it matters

Errors caught late are expensive. Expert review reduces risk before issues scale.

Production AI needs real-world expert review

The hardest AI failures happen in production, where local context, regulation, and domain expertise matter. We turn expert judgment into structured data that improves model performance.

Step 01
Production task intake

Tasks are collected from real-world workflows where model quality, local context, and reliability matter.

Focused on production failures, not synthetic demos

Step 02
Local expert review

Doctors, lawyers, regulatory specialists, and local experts evaluate outputs, identify risks, and apply corrections.

High-signal feedback from professionals with real-world context

Step 03
Structured data creation

Expert feedback is converted into evaluation sets, preference data, and curated training examples.

Built for fine-tuning, evals, and production monitoring

Step 04
Safer model deployment

Models improve before mistakes become more expensive across users, workflows, and geographies.

Better performance, lower risk, stronger production reliability

Deliverables
Evaluation sets

Structured tasks for model assessment and regression tracking.

Fine-tuning data

Curated examples for domain adaptation and instruction tuning.

Preference data

Expert comparisons and ranked outputs for model improvement.

Local expert reviews

Specialist validation for healthcare, legal, regulatory, and country-specific workflows.

Production QA signals

Structured failure signals for reliability, risk reduction, and release readiness.

The biggest challenge in AI is not just capability. It is performance and safety in production.
Models break when local context, regulation, and domain expertise are missing.
Expert review closes that gap before failures scale.

We help AI labs improve systems with the people who actually understand the problem in the real world.

The gap is not just model quality. It is production readiness.

Benchmarks show how far models still are from reliable real-world performance. Closing that gap requires expert review and better data.

GAIA

General AI Assistant Benchmark

Human vs AI gap
77%
Original15%
Human92%
202644.8%
WebArena

Web Agent Tasks

Human vs AI gap
64%
Original14.4%
Human78.2%
202657.1%
OSWorld

Computer Environment Tasks

Human vs AI gap
60%
Original12.2%
Human72.4%
202672.6%
Better benchmarks matter. But expert correction on real production tasks is what makes systems safer and more useful.

Use cases

Expert review and curated datasets for teams building, evaluating, and improving AI systems.

Healthcare

Healthcare models fail when they lack clinical judgment, patient communication quality, and local medical context. Specialist review improves safety, clarity, and production performance.

What teams need

  • Clinical review
  • Triage validation
  • Patient-safe outputs
  • Local medical context

What improves

  • Safer responses
  • Better clinical reasoning
  • Lower production risk
  • More reliable patient guidance

Better data and better review systems for teams improving AI performance.

Talk with Xase about expert review and production QA.

Get in touch